Press "Enter" to skip to content

What is an action that Congress could take to respond to the Arizona v United States decision if it disagreed with the decision?

5c Explain an action that Congress could take to respond to the Arizona v. United States decision if it disagreed with the decision. Congress could tax the state on necessary resources to encourage it to work with Congress law. It could also not choose not to issue grants to the state.

Why the facts of Gonzales v Raich led to a different holding from the holding in United States v Lopez?

Gonzales v. Raich was different because Marijuana could be taken outside of California which means it would go into 49 other states that does not have legal medical marijuana. Marijuana is a national market and therefore was apart of interstate commerce, making it so the national government could restrict.

How can the interaction between Congress and the presidency can be affected by linkage institutions?

Interactions between Congress and the President can be affected by linkage institutions because linkage institutions link one branch of government to another. So, interactions between the legislative branch and Congress can affect whether the bill gets passed.

What is the constitutional clause that is common to both Brandenburg v Ohio and Schenck v United States?

(a) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) and Schenck v. United States (1919). The First Amendment is relevant to both cases as both defendants were charged with making anti-government speech.

Did Gonzales or Raich win?

Decision. The ruling was 6–3 with Justice Stevens writing the opinion of the court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Souter and Breyer.

What was the main issue in the Gonzales v Raich case quizlet?

Ruling: The court ruled that the Commerce Clause along with the Federal Controlled Substances Act could allow the federal government to preempt state laws legalizing the use of medical marijuana. The ruling was 6-3.

What was the outcome of Gonzales v Raich?

In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court held that the commerce clause gave Congress authority to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana, despite state law to the contrary.

Does the Controlled Substances Act CSA exceed Congress power under the commerce clause?

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, relying on the Court’s recent Commerce Clause decisions in United States v. Lopez6 and United States v. Morrison, (Lopez/Morrison)7 held that, “as applied” to the respondents, the CSA exceeded Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause.

How did Gonzales v Raich affect balance of power?

The case eventually went to the Supreme Court. The Court upheld the Controlled Substances Act and affirmed Congress’s power to ban local use and cultivation of marijuana.

How does the case of Angel Raich and Diane Monson demonstrate the tension in American federalism between state and federal laws?

1) How does the case of Angel raich and Diane Monson demonstrate the tension in American federalism between state and federal laws? -Raich and Monson are both comply( obey) with the state California that is legally accept the use of marijuana. Supreme court can use all of these laws.