Start Searching the Answers
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
Express common intention An express common intention requires evidence of express discussions between the parties which demonstrates that the property is to be shared beneficially: HSBC Bank Plc v Dyche  EWHC 2954 Case summary.
The expression ‘common intention’ means unity of purpose or a pre-arranged plan; it has been given various meanings which are as follows- · Common intention implies a pre-arranged plan, prior meeting of minds, prior consultation in between all the persons constituting the group [Ref.
common intention required by Section 34 is different from the same intention or similar intention. As has been observed by the Privy Council in Mahbub Shah v. King-Emperor 72 IA… Section 149 this case is similar to the case with which we are concerned in the present appeal.
Common Intention implies a meeting of mind of the persons charged of the crime, requiring a preliminary unity. Common Object refers to a purpose which is shared by all the members of an unlawful assembly. All the persons involved in committing the crime are equally liable.
India Code: Section Details. [34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention. —When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.]
Creating a common object in an object category enables users to access the attributes of additional objects through a common set of measure objects when they configure an Aprimo report or report mart. Each common object is specific to the object category in which it is created.
v. In Section 34, two or more persons can commit the criminal act whereas in Section 149, five persons are necessary to constitute the offence. vi. Section 34 is about the joint liability but does not create any specific offence whereas Section 149, creates an specific offence.
Common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is a species of constructive liability that renders every member of a group who shares such intention responsible for the criminal act committed by anyone of them when such an act is done in furtherance of the common intention.
—If an offence is committed by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that assembly, or such as the members of that assembly knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of that object, every person who, at the time of the committing of that offence, is a member of the same …
It refers to the liability of two or more persons for an offence. Section 34 of the I.P.C.,1860, states that – where an act is done by the several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each of them would be liable for that act in the same manner as it is done by him alone.
Punishment for dacoity. Whoever commits dacoity shall be punished with 1[imprisonment for life], or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Section 396.
Constructive liability is the one where the liability is not determined by the existence of the fundamental elements of crime. The liability is based on a Latin maxim “versari in re illicita” which means a person may also be criminally held liable for any consequences resulting from his unlawful conduct.
What is a constructive liability offence? a) It is another term for a strict liability offence. b) A form of corporate liability. c) A form of complicity. d) D commits a certain base crime, but in doing so causes more harm than was intended, and becomes liable for a more serious crime.
Punishment is a process by which the state inflicts some pain to the persons or property of person who is found guilty of Crime. In other words punishment is sanction imposed on an accused for the infringement of the established rules.
There are majorly four theories of punishment. These theories are the deterrent theory, retributive theory, preventive theory, and reformative theory.