Start Searching the Answers
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
The Question & Answer (Q&A) Knowledge Managenet
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
On TV crime shows, forensic science always just manages to pinpoint the criminal in the span of a televised hour — and with 100 percent accuracy.
Who decides whether expert witnesses can testify in court? The judge. Lawyers for each side will submit lists of witnesses to the judge and each other and the judge will decide.
The Report, written by the US President’s Science and Technology advisors (PCAST), concludes that DNA analysis is the only forensic technique that is absolutely reliable.
People are interested in forensic science because of shows that spark people’s entertainment. 2. How are fingerprints analyzed? Fingerprints are analyzed by comparison of a ‘known fingerprint’.
Forensic Medical Examiner Perhaps the highest paying position in the field of forensic science is forensic medical examiner.
Emotional and Physical Effects. Many of the crimes forensic scientists investigate involve violence, including murder, rape and assault. As part of their analysis, they may examine bloody clothing, study blood spatter and possibly view victims’ bodies. In some cases, the bodies might be severely decomposed.
Physical evidence is generally much more reliable than testimonial evidence. Case 2.1 illustrates how some convictions are based solely on eyewitness accounts. Note how the defense did indeed challenge the accuracy of the eyewitness accounts, but the court accepted the testimony as fact.
Sometimes forensic testimony fails to include information on the limitations of the methods used in the analysis, such as the method’s error rates and situations in which the method has, and has not, been shown to be valid.
Despite numerous advantages of this science, there are some ethical, legal, and knowledge constraints involved in forensic analysis. ☛ DNA analysis of a person is believed to be against human ethics, as it reveals private information about an individual. ☛ Equipment used in forensics is expensive.
Error Rates: Most forensic sciences lack good information about how often examiners make mistakes – a basic requirement of any good science. Experts testifying in court often claim error rates for their technique is zero. Adding insult in injury, experts who testify are allowed to claim their methods are 100% accurate.
Yes, forensic scientist make mistakes, we are all human. For example, a forensic scientist forgot to test a piece of DNA in the Steven Avery case. Mistakes can make negative and positive implications.
For example, forensic testimonies can be misleading. There have been cases where results were fabricated or where evidence that would have led to a guilty conviction were concealed. Innocent mistakes can happen, too. Practitioners can sometimes confuse or contaminate samples.
Support your points. What implications can this have? Yes because you have imperfect human beings using imperfect science striving for perfect conclusions. In the Mayfield case, an Oregon man who got arrested for apparently being a “100% match” was not actually the man they needed.
There are two categories of errors: practical and theoretical errors. Practical errors are caused in the rendering of forensic testimony while theoretical errors are errors caused by invalidated science principles and methods and errors in applying these principles and methods.
The Seven S’s of Crime-Scene Investigation
The forensic scientist will, at some point, have to testify. Testimony is the verbal statement of a witness, under oath, to the judge or jury. Forensic scientists are “expert” witnesses as opposed to ordinary or “fact” witnesses. Sometimes in court, the work or qualifications of the forensic scientist are challenged.
To avoid contamination of evidence that may contain DNA, always take the following precautions: Avoid touching your face, nose, and mouth when collecting and packaging evidence. Air-dry evidence thoroughly before packaging. Put evidence into new paper bags or envelopes, not into plastic bags.
Environmental factors, such as heat and humidity, can also accelerate the degradation of DNA. For example, wet or moist evidence that is packaged in plastic will provide a growth environment for bacteria that can destroy DNA evidence.
Evidence that is wet or that may contain body fluids (blood, semen, etc.) must be air-dried completely. Such items should be packaged in paper bags/boxes. Known samples can be collected by rubbing sterile swabs against the cheek, inside the mouth.
DNA evidence found at the crime scene doesn’t necessarily implicate you without other corroborating evidence. While DNA evidence may be considered the same as a fingerprint, and can link a suspect to a crime, a criminal conviction requires much more.
Trace evidence isn’st usually enough to convict a suspect, but it can be critical in placing the suspect at the scene of the crime! Trace evidence identification is a continually evolving field that plays an important role in crime solving.
Last year, the bureau admitted that it had reviewed testimony by its microscopic-hair-comparison analysts and found errors in at least 90 percent of the cases. A thorough investigation is now under way. DNA typing has long been held up as the exception to the rule—an infallible technique rooted in unassailable science.
They’re not wrong: DNA is the most accurate forensic science we have. It has exonerated scores of people convicted based on more flawed disciplines like hair or bite-mark analysis. And there have been few publicized cases of DNA mistakenly implicating someone in a crime.
Yes you can be framed by your own DNA!
A DNA paternity test is nearly 100% accurate at determining whether a man is another person’s biological father. DNA tests can use cheek swabs or blood tests.
Determining Paternity without a DNA Test?
Paternity testing with just a father and a child usually produces a high CPI and a very high Probability of Paternity (usually 99.99% or greater if he is the father). However, sometimes the matches between father and child aren’t strong enough for conclusive results.
Paternity Test Problem #2: Spitting on Swabs Instead of Swabbing Cheek Cells. With the new popularity of some ancestry tests, it’s easy for paternity customers to get confused between collecting cheek cells and collecting spit, or saliva. The two types of samples are definitely not interchangeable.
For less than $100, folks can discover their ancestry and uncover potentially dangerous genetic mutations. About 12 million Americans have bought these kits in recent years. But DNA testing isn’t risk-free — far from it. The kits jeopardize people’s privacy, physical health, and financial well-being.
If the tested father is not the child’s biological father, the results will be exclusion of paternity. The probability of paternity in this case would be 0% and the Statement of Results on the report will read “The alleged father is excluded as the biological father of the tested child.